Proposed Regulations
for Pre-Publication in
Part I, Canada Gazette
|
Statutory Authority
&
Regulatory Plan Listing
|
|
The proposed amendments
would increase landing, general terminal and/or aircraft
parking charges at 37 airports, as part of the shift to
local ownership and financial self-sufficiency by way of
increases in user charges.
The changes in user fees are
expected to generate an additional $5.3-million in annual
revenues, representing about a 12.85% increase over
existing levels; the increases have been capped at any
airport at $2.50 per enplaned/deplaned passenger (for
more than half of the airports, the increase is less than
half the $2.50 cap).
The one exception to the
capping of increases is Schefferville Airport which shows
an impact of $3.12 per enplaned/deplaned passenger. A
doubling of the landing charges was agreed to by airlines
if the Department agreed to restore the runway.
Several other changes are
also proposed:
- the special landing
charges applicable to international flights making
refueling stops at Gander would be increased to $6.11
from $5.68 on the first 30 000 000 kg in accumulated
weight landed, to $5.14 from $4.71 on the next 14 800
000 kg in accumulated weight landed, and to $4.75 from
$4.32 on any weight in excess of 44 800 000 kg in
accumulated weight landed;
|
Aeronautics Act ,
subsection 4.4(2); Ministerial Regulations Authorization
Order, section 2
Published in Canada Gazette
March 14, 1998
|
- the loading bridge
charge at Québec (Jean-Lesage) Airport would
increase to $80 from $61 for each connection of an
aircraft to the loading bridge;
- the loading bridge
charge at Regina Airport would increase to $60 from
$54 for each 90-minute period or portion thereof that
an aircraft is connected to the loading bridge; and
- references to Kamloops,
Kapuskasing, Moncton, Springbank, Sydney, Thunder Bay
and Yarmouth airports have been removed from the
Regulations as these airports have been transferred to
local control and as such are no longer subject to
these Regulations.
- Contact: Dan Cogliati,
Director, Cost Recovery, Department of Transport,
Place de Ville, Tower C, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0N5. Tel: 993-5769; Fax: 991-4410.
|
|
|
The proposed amendment will
establish new standard container sizes for frozen French
fried potatoes in the range between 2 kilograms and 20
kilograms; they will also deregulate standard container
requirements for frozen potatoes other than frozen French
fried potatoes.
Currently, the largest
container size currently prescribed in the Regulations
for frozen French fried potatoes is 2 kilograms.
This proposed change will
allow manufacturers and importers to market this product
more efficiently and economically and will harmonize the
Regulations with industry standards in both Canada and
the United States.
The larger containers are
generally intended for food service customers and may
qualify for certain labelling exemptions.
Several other amendments are
also proposed:
- the definition of
"container" is being amended to accommodate the larger
food service sizes;
- the definition of
"package" is being deleted because the current
definition is ambiguous and it will become redundant
with the new definition of "container";
- a labelling provision is
being amended to clearly show that the labelling
requirements apply equally to Canadian and imported
products;
- a new labelling
provision is being introduced to require that the
unlabelled inner units of a food service product must
be labelled in accordance with the Regulations if
those units are removed from the larger container and
offered for sale separately;
- to deregulate standard
containers for ripe or black olives. This product is
not packed in Canada and importers have indicated that
the existing standard container requirement was
intended for green olives which are imported in bulk
and repacked in Canada. Black (ripe) olives are
imported as prepackaged products.
- the declaration of net
quantity requirement for all food products is being
amended to require only metric units; however, other
equivalent units of measurement will be permitted to
be shown along with the metric units provided the
other units of measurement are not more prominently
displayed than are the metric units; and
- the existing standard
containers prescribed for frozen potatoes other than
frozen French fried potatoes and for unspecified
frozen vegetables are being deleted because the
industry no longer sees any advantage in maintaining
standard container sizes for these products.
|
Canada Agricultural
Products Act , section 32
Published in Canada Gazette
March 7, 1998
|
- Contact: J. F. Standish,
Associate Director, Processed Products Section, Dairy,
Fruit and Vegetable Division, Canadian Food Inspection
Agency, 59 Camelot Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0Y9.
Tel: 225-2342, Extension 4725; Fax: 228-6632; e-mail:
jstandish@em.agr.ca
|
|
Exempt from Pre-Publication
and Approved
|
Statutory Authority
&
Regulatory Plan Listing
|
Special
Appointment Regulations, No. 1998-4
(SOR/98-151,
OIC 1998-343)
The regulations make the
following appointments and exempt the appointments from
the application of the Public Service Employment Act,
except sections 32, 33 and 34, while the appointee is in
the position:
- Huguette
Labelle as Deputy Head of the Millenium Bureau of
Canada, effective March 12, 1998.
- Contact: Senior
Personnel Management, Privy Council Office, Postal
Station B Building, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3. Tel:
613-957-5288
|
Public
Service Employment Act, subsection 37(1)
Not included in Federal
Regulatory Plan
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
Honey Regulations,
amendment
(SOR/98-153,
OIC 1998-346); Honey Fees Order, amendment
(SOR/98-163)
The Honey Regulations have
been amended to clarify the grading and packer
registration requirements and to simplify the wording of
the Regulations respecting interprovincial shipment of
honey and exemptions for the shipment of bulk honey.
Details of these changes
(although not the actual proposed amendments) were
prepublished on August 9, 1997, along with amendments to
the Honey Fees Order.
The fees Order introduces a
new compliance assistance fee, at a rate which is the
greater of $87 or $21.75 pert quarter hour, rounded to
the nearest quarter hour. The service will be provided,
as resources permit, when a client requests the presence
of an inspector to meet the requirements of the relevant
inspection regulations.
More specifically, the
amendments:
- repeal a provision that
permitted grade names to be used on packages of honey
if the honey was packed, classified and graded in
accordance with the written authority of an inspector.
This provision pre-dated the current Canada
Agricultural Products Act and is considered an
improper sub-delegation of authority under this
statute. This regulation has been repealed and
replaced by a provision that permits the grades to be
used only for honey that is prepared in a registered
establishment. This change reflects the grading
requirements found in other food regulations
administered by Food Inspection Agency.
- prescribe requirements
respecting the interprovincial shipment of honey.
Under international trade agreements, the principle of
national treatment requires that imported products be
treated the same as domestically traded products. The
absence of specific interprovincial trade provisions
in the Regulations created an ambiguous situation with
respect to imports. This has been clarified with the
introduction of requirements for the interprovincial
shipment of honey that mirror the export and import
requirements, including exemptions for the shipment of
bulk honey.
|
Plant Protection Act, S.C.,
1990, c. 22; Financial Administration Act, paragraphs
19(1)(b) and 19.1(b)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
- remove a restriction
which limited producer-graders to packing only honey
produced at their own apiaries. This was not
compatible where producer-graders had an opportunity
to expand their business to pack honey produced by
other apiaries. This restriction has been removed to
expand market access opportunities for all producers.
- Contact: J. F. Standish,
Associate Director, Processed Products Section, Dairy,
Fruit and Vegetable Division, Canadian Food Inspection
Agency, 59 Camelot Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0Y9.
Tel: 225-2342, Extension 4725; Fax: 228-6632; e-mail:
jstandish@em.agr.ca.
|
|
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Regulations, amendment
(SOR/98-155,
OIC 1998-348); Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Fees Order,
amendment
(SOR/98-162)
The amendments deregulates
the grading and inspection of fresh fruits and vegetables
for export. This change will allow the Canadian produce
industry to be more flexible and innovative in their
export marketing approach.
Food inspection and
certification for export purposes will continue to be
available on request, particularly when an importing
country requires Canadian government inspection.
The heading before section
31 and sections 31 and 32 are repealed.
The fees Order introduces a
new compliance assistance fee, at a rate which is the
greater of $87 or $21.75 pert quarter hour, based on the
program hourly rate. The service will be provided, as
resources permit, when a client requests the presence of
an inspector to meet the requirements of the relevant
inspection regulations.
The fees Order also
increases the fee for verification of an import
declaration to $14 per shipment from $11.
The regulations come into
effect March 12, 1998.
- Contact: R. Cardinal,
A/Associate Director, Dairy, Fruit and Vegetable
Division, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 59 Camelot
Drive, Nepean, Ontario K I A OY9. Tel: 613-225-2342,
ext. 4640; Fax: 613-228-6632; e-mail:
rcardinal@em.agr.ca.
|
Canada Agricultural Products
Act, R.S., c. 20 (4th Supp.); Financial Administration
Act, paragraphs 19(1)(b) and 19.1(b)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
Maple Products Regulations,
amendment
(SOR/98-154,
OIC 1998-347); Maple Products Fees Order, amendment
(SOR/98-164)
The amendments exempt
smaller maple producer establishments from the export
certification requirements if they are operated under the
terms and conditions of the Canadian Food Inspection
Agency (CFA) Quality Management System (QMS) for Canadian
Maple Products Exporters, published by the Agency on
September 1, 1997.
The fees Order introduces a
new compliance assistance fee, at a rate which is the
greater of $87 or $21.75 pert quarter hour, based on the
program hourly rate. The service will be provided, as
resources permit, when a client requests the presence of
an inspector to meet the requirements of the relevant
inspection regulations.
The regulations come into
effect March 12, 1998.
- Contact: J. F. Standish,
Associate Director, Processed Products Section, Dairy,
Fruit and Vegetable Division, Canadian Food Inspection
Agency, 59 Camelot Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0Y9.
Tel: 225-2342, Extension 4725; Fax: 228-6632; e-mail:
jstandish@em.agr.ca
|
Canada Agricultural Products
Act, R.S., c. 20 (4th Supp.); Financial Administration
Act, paragraphs 19(1)(b) and 19.1(b)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
Town of Jasper Zoning
Regulations, amendment
(SOR/98-167,
OIC 1998-369)
The amendments, which come
into effect March 13, 1998, rezone three areas in that
town to permit increased residential densities on the
specified lots.
The amendment will help
address a general housing shortage in the Town of Jasper,
allow the existing, limited land base to be used more
efficiently, and provide more affordable housing for
residents of the town.
More specifically:
- on Block 25, Lots 1 and
20, the zoning will change from R1, one-family
dwelling district, to R2, two-family dwelling
district. The zoning change will permit the
construction of a duplex which will provide part of
the staff accommodation required by a commercial
enterprise currently under development on Block 9,
Lots 14 and 15.
- on Block A, Lot 9 and
Block 37, Lots 12 to 18, lands previously zoned as
public open space will be rezoned to R3,
multiple-family dwelling district. The zoning of these
areas to R3 will permit the development of a
nonprofit, co-operative housing project which will
consist of two multiple-family townhouse complexes.
The proposed zoning changes
were recommended by independent planning studies and
conform with the objectives and guidelines contained in
the residential development section of the 1988 Jasper
Town Plan.
- Contact: Sharon Budd,
Project Manager, Regulatory Development, National
Parks, Parks Canada, Department of Canadian Heritage,
4th Floor, 25 Eddy Street, Hull, Québec, K1A
0M5 Tel: 819-994-2698; Fax: 819-994-5140.
|
National Parks Act,
paragraph 7(1)(o)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
Pre-Published and Approved
With comments or
changes
|
Statutory Authority
&
Regulatory Plan Listing
|
Plant Protection Fees
Regulations, repeal
(SOR/98-152,
OIC 1998-345); Plant Protection Cost Recovery Fees Order
(SOR/98-161)
The Government has repealed
the Plant Protection Fees Regulations, effective March
12, 1998, and replaced them with the Plant Protection
Cost Recovery Fees Order. The fees order was enacted
under the authority of the Financial Administration Act
instead of the Plant Protection Act.
The fees Order increases the
fees stipulated in the Plant Protection Fees Regulations
from 34% to 50%.
New fees for domestic
inspection services are introduced and are calculated on
a basis of 25% cost recovery. All other new fees are
calculated at 50% for those import and export inspection
services for which the Canadian Food Inspection Agency
cost recovers.
The fees Order includes fees
for such services as laboratory tests and related
services, designation of inspectors (i.e.,
accreditation), inspection services for domestic
facilities (e.g., lumber mills, flour mills, field crop
inspections) and conveyances (e.g., used containers).
These services include re-inspection and follow-up
actions (e.g, an inspection to verify the effectiveness
of a treatment, release from detention).
|
Plant Protection Act, S.C.,
1990, c. 22; Financial Administration Act, paragraphs
19(1)(b) and 19.1(b)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
|
In addition to the fees for
the issuance of an import permit or phytosanitary
certificates, a fee is charged for the issuance of a
Movement Certificate. The fees Order also contains a
payment provision stipulating when the fees are payable.
All overtime fees, including
the overtime inspection for grain, contains a payment
provision stipulating when the fees are payable.
All overtime fees, including
the overtime inspection for grain vessels, are specified
in the FPI Branch Overtime Fees Order.
Both the proposed repeal and
the replacement fees Order were republished in the Canada
Gazette Part I, on September 6, 1997.
Following the
prepublication, a number of changes were made, including:
- postponement of fees
under the Seed Potato Certification Program;
- establishment of a $100
inspection fee for Christmas tree yards where the cut
trees are collected at one location prior to export;
Christmas tree industry representatives disagreed with
the fee category proposed for field inspection of such
products.
- lowering the specific
fees for imported shipments of fresh fruits and
vegetables, based on the estimated number of shipments
presented for entry into Canada. As a result, the fee
for fresh fruits and vegetables, where the lot
consists of not more than 250 boxes or bags, is $28.
Where the lot consists of more than 250 boxes or bags,
the fee is $48.
- amending the proposed
fees for the apple ermine moth nursery field
inspection to reflect the fee per hectare as requested
by industry.
- clarifying that the
laboratory fees will only apply to testing, done at
the Centre of Expertise Laboratories at Sidney, B.C.,
at Nepean, Ontario, and at Charlottetown, PEI.
The Food Inspection Agency
has said it will explore alternative delivery
arrangements for inspection services within the various
industry sectors affected by the fees Order.
- Contact: Dr. Jean
Hollebone, Director Plant Protection Division,
Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 59 Camelot Drive,
Nepean, Ontario, K1A 0Y9. Tel: 613-225-2342, extension
4316; Fax: 613-228-6606.
|
|
Industrial Hemp Regulations
(SOR/98-156,
OIC 1998-352); Amendment to Schedule II of the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act
(SOR/98-157,
OIC 1998-353); Narcotic Control Regulations, amendment
(SOR/98-158,
OIC 1998-354)
The Industrial Hemp
Regulations will permit the legal production and
processing of hemp for commercial purposes while
providing compliance and enforcement mechanisms to
prevent diversion of Cannabis to the illicit drug market.
Cultivation of hemp is
currently permitted for scientific studies only under
licenses issued by Health Canada under the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA).
Hemp refers to varieties of
the Cannabis plant that have a low content of
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which are generally
cultivated for fibre. Varieties with a high content of
THC are referred to as marihuana. The psychoactive
ingredient in marihuana is THC.
The Regulations define
industrial hemp as the plants and plant parts of the
Cannabis plant, the leaves and flowering heads of which
do not contain more than 0.3 per cent THC. It includes
the derivatives of the plant, and plant parts such as the
oil derived from hemp seeds.
|
Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act, subsection 55(l) and section 60
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
|
The Regulations define seed
as "any part of an industrial hemp plant that is
represented, sold or used to grow a plant".
Industrial hemp does not
include non-viable Cannabis seed, other than its
derivatives, or mature Cannabis stalks. Leaves, flowers,
seeds or branches, or fibre derived from those stalks are
included.
Hemp seed oil, and seed
cake, regardless of the viability of the seed source, are
considered derivatives of Cannabis and are therefore
controlled under the CDSA. To make this clear, these
Regulations modify Schedule II to the CDSA and the
Schedule to the Narcotic Control Regulations to clarify
the status of derivatives.
More specifically, under the
Industrial Hemp Regulations:
- Importers and exporters
of industrial hemp, in the form of seed or viable
grain, will be licensed. In addition to holding a
licence they will also be required to obtain a permit
for each shipment.
- The importer must ensure
that shipments of viable grain are accompanied by
foreign certification. A list will be published by
Health Canada indicating which countries are
designated as having equivalent controls on the
production of grain. Grain may only be imported from
listed countries. This will ensure that grain imported
will not produce a plant containing more than 0.3%
THC.
- Seed growers will be
restricted to a 0.4 hectare minimum plot size and will
be required to demonstrate current membership with the
Canadian Seed Growers Association as part of their
licence application. Seed growers will be required to
provide the number of hectares grown in the previous
two years as part of their licence application.
- Plant breeders will not
be restricted by minimum plot sizes. Persons applying
for a licence as a plant breeder must be registered
with the Canadian Seed Growers Association and may
only cultivate industrial hemp under this regulatory
framework. The pedigreed seed restriction which
applies to growers in the year 2000 does not apply to
plant breeders nor does the limitation to the "List of
Approved Cultivars"
- Growers for fibre or
grain will require a licence before they can purchase
seeds from a distributor or cultivate industrial hemp.
Growers will be required to provide the number of
hectares grown in the previous two years as part of
their licence application.
- Only approved varieties
of industrial hemp seeds, as listed on Health Canada's
"List of Approved Cultivars" may be planted.
Commencing January 1, 2000, only pedigreed seeds of
approved varieties may be planted. Growers will be
required to identify their fields, and maintain
records of production and distribution.
- Licences and audit trail
requirements will also be required for processing
activities such as pressing seeds into oil. All
parties licensed or authorized will be required to
identify a person resident in Canada who will be
responsible for the licensed activities.
- To obtain a licence for
the importation, exportation, production, or sale of
industrial hemp, applicants will be required to
produce a police security check.
- Derivatives of seed or
grain, such as oil and seed cake, will be exempted
from the Regulations if there is evidence that the
derivatives contain no more than 10 micrograms of
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per gram and carry
appropriate labelling statements.
|
|
- Products made from
derivatives of seed or grain will be exempted if there
is evidence that each lot or batch contains no more
than 10 micrograms of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per
gram.
- Importers and exporters
of derivatives will be required to provide proof with
each shipment that the shipment contains no more than
10 micrograms of delta-9
- tetrahydrocannabinol per
gram for each lot to ensure that the product is within
the limit.
- Similarly products made
from the derivatives of seed or grain must be
accompanied with evidence that each shipment contains
no more than 10 micrograms of delta-9
tetrahydrocannabinol per gram.
- No person will be
permitted to import or export a derivative or a
product produced from a derivative that contains more
than 10 micrograms of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per
gram.
- No person will be
permitted to import or sell whole plants, including
sprouts or the leaves, flowers or bracts of industrial
hemp; or import, sell, or produce any derivative or
any product made from a derivative of the above.
- Authorizations will be
required for transportation, when products are
transported outside the direction or control of a
licence holder, or for possession for the purpose of
testing for viability.
- No person shall
advertise to imply that a derivative or product is
psychoactive.
- Testing for the level of
THC in leaves or in derivatives must be done by a
competent laboratory according to standards defined by
Health Canada.
- Growers will be required
to identify the coordinates of their field by using
global positioning system (GPS) and provide a legal
description of the location of the land to be
cultivated.
The proposed Regulation was
published with a 45 day comment period in Canada Gazette
Part I on December 27, 1997.
As a result of the
prepublication and other consultations, several changes
were made to the proposed Regulations, including:
- the inclusion of a
Ministerial list of approved varieties along with
administrative guidelines to provide information
concerning compliance action where the crop produced
from approved varieties exceeds the 0.3% THC limit.
The guidelines will provide flexibility for crops
which exceed the 0.3% THC limit. Enforcement options
range from immediate harvesting to destruction
depending on the THC level.
- provision of criteria by
which the Minister may designate certain varieties
which are suitable for Canadian use. This list will
include some OECD varieties but will also include
other varieties which meet the criteria set out in the
Regulations. The change to the Regulations to permit
the use of seeds contained on the Ministerial list
should help to reduce the cost to growers; however,
only approved cultivars will be permitted on the list
to ensure a low THC starting point for the crop.
- addition of a
requirement that documentation accompany each imported
shipment to certify that the shipment contains no more
than 10 micrograms/g of THC. This certification can
then be presented to Customs prior to release in
Canada and will ensure that all derivatives, whether
produced domestically or imported, all meet the same
requirements.
|
|
- inclusion of a sunset
clause to permit growers to cultivate uncertified
approved cultivars until December 31, 1999. The
Regulations have also been modified to require
official seed certification rather than an OECD seed
tag. In addition, the varietal status of the imported
seed must be validated by a designated authority in
the country of origin. To allow the use of seeds of
non-certified varieties during the sunset period, the
Regulations have been modified to provide an exemption
until January 1, 2000. Efforts are also underway to
support the modification of Schedule III to the Seeds
Regulations to include Cannabis and establish a
variety registration system for Canada.
- introduction of a 0.4.
hectare minimum for seed growers while retaining, the
4 hectares minimum for producers of fibre or grain.
This change resulted in numerous changes within the
Regulations to provide a specialized framework for
plant breeders and seed growers while ensuring more
efficient enforcement.
- allowance of small
divisions within a single site, hence balancing the
need to maintain control of locations with the need to
adapt to the environmental conditions present.
- clarifications with
respect to packaging, including a definition for
package which is consistent with the definition in the
Seeds Act. The definition of package "includes a sack,
bag, barrel, case, or any other container in which
seed, viable grain or its derivatives are placed or
packed". The Regulations were also modified to clarify
the requirement to fasten the package in a manner
which harmonizes the requirements with the Seeds
Regulations:fastened with respect to "package" means
sealed in such a manner that it is impossible to open
the package easily without leaving evidence of it
having been opened.
- a requirement for a
licence amendment for changes in field location. In
addition, the Regulations have been amended to include
a requirement for a legal description of the land to
facilitate inspection.
- addition of an
advertising provision to prohibit the promotion of
industrial hemp products to produce a psychotropic
effect.
The associated amendment to
Schedule II of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
replaces subitem 1(8) with "non-viable Cannabis seed,
with the exception of its derivative." The same change is
made to subitem 17(8) of the schedule to the Narcotic
Control Regulations.
The regulations come into
force March 12, 1998.
- Contact: Lauraine
Bégin, Policy Division, Bureau of Policy and
Coordination Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health
Protection Building, Address Locator 0702B1, Tunney's
Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0L2. Tel: 613-957-0372;
Fax: 613-941-6458; e-mail: lauraine-begin@hcsc.gc.ca
|
|
Motor Vehicle Restraint
Systems and Booster Cushions Safety Regulations
(SOR/98-159,
OIC 1998-355); Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations
(Restraint Systems Consequential Amendments), amendment
(SOR/98-160,
OIC 1998-356)
The new regulations govern
restraint systems and booster cushions that are installed
after purchase by users and replace the requirements
governing "add-on" restraint systems and booster cushions
contained in sections 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 of the
Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations.
|
Motor Vehicle Safety Act,
S.C., 1993, c. 16
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
|
Consequently, sections
21-31, 21-3.1, 213.2, and 213.3 of the Motor Vehicle
Safety Regulations are being repealed. Since built-in
child restraint systems and built-in booster cushions are
integral parts of the motor vehicle, section 213.4, which
governs these components, will remain in the Motor
Vehicle Safety Regulations.
Due to new requirements
imposed by the revised Motor Vehicle Safety Act, which
came into force on April 12, 1995, several provisions of
a non-technical nature have been added relating the use
of the national safety mark and the keeping of records;
the maintenance of a registration system by
manufacturers; the issuance of Notices of Defect; and the
keeping of records by importers as evidence of
conformity.
Several additional changes
have been made by the Department in order to clarify
certain provisions. In addition, the requirements of two
other proposed regulatory initiatives have been
incorporated, including the requirement for a statement
to be placed on infant restraint systems that warns
against installing them in the front seat of a vehicle
equipped with a passenger-side air bag.
The proposed regulations
were prepublished in the Canada Gazette, Part I, July 13,
1996 and again on January 18, 1997.
The new Regulations come
into effect March 15, 1998.
- Contact: France Legault,
Road Safety and Motor Vehicle Regulation, Department
of Transport, 330 Sparks Street, Place de Ville, Tower
C, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0N5. Tel: 613-998-1963; Fax:
613-990-2911; e-mail: LEGAULF@tc.gc.ca
|
|
Patented Medicines (Notice of
Compliance) Regulations, amendment
(SOR/98-166,
OIC 1998-366)
The amendments would
introduce a number of improvements to the Regulations
designed to make the Regulations fairer and more
effective, and reduce unnecessary litigation.
More specifically, the
changes include:
- reducing the length of
stay to 24 months from 30 months, whereby the Minister
is prevented from issuing a Notice of Compliance (NOC)
while patent issues are resolved;
- modifying court
discretion to lengthen or shorten a stay, based on the
diligence of the patentee in pursuing its application;
- specifying circumstances
in which damages or costs can be awarded, including
allowing the court to award costs to either a generic
manufacturer or a patentee, including solicitor and
client costs;
- requiring patentees to
certify that the patents submitted on a patent list
are relevant to the particular version of a drug;
- authorizing the Minister
of Health to audit the patent list and to remove
ineligible patents from the patent list;
- clarifying the court's
capacity to order disclosure to the patentee of a
generic manufacturer's NOC submission, as well as to
require that documents disclosed be treated
confidentially;
- requiring a generic
manufacturer to indicate to the patentee the version
of the drug it intends to market (with respect to a
notice of allegation (NOA) relating to
non-infringement);
- preventing a NOA
relating to non-infringement being submitted without a
generic manufacturer having first filed a submission
for NOC approval with the Minister of Health;
|
Patent Act ,
section 5 and subsection 55.2(4)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
- imposing the burden of
proof of proving that a patent would not be infringed
on a generic manufacturer seeking to make a version of
a patentee's drug and alleging non-infringement of a
product-by-process patent on the patent list; and
- providing for a generic
manufacturer to be able to have the patentee's case
dismissed at an early stage, in certain circumstances.
The proposed changes respond
to the April 1997 report of the Standing Committee on
Industry reviewing the Patent Act Amendment Act,
1992 .
The government has indicated
its willingness to bring the proposed regulations into
force on a stage basis, in order not to given either
patentees or generic manufacturers any strategic
advantage.
The proposed amendments were
prepublished in the Canada Gazette Part I on January 24,
1998.
Changes to the regulations
come into force on March 12, 1998. Specific transitional
rules deal with how the amended regulations will apply to
existing and new proceedings.
- Contact: Vinita Watson,
Director General, Corporate Governance Branch,
Industry Canada, 235 Queen Street, West Tower, 5th
Floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0H5. Tel: 613-952-0211;
Fax: 613-952-1980; E-mail: watson.vinita@ic.gc.ca
|
|
Ministerial Orders
Approved
|
Statutory Authority
&
Regulatory Plan Listing
|
Canadian Turkey Marketing
Quota Regulations, 1990, amendment
(SOR/98-169)
This amendment, which comes
into force on March 17, 1998, revises the limitations to
be applied when determining the market allotment of a
producer or when issuing a new market allotment of a
turkey producer or when issuing a new market allotment
with a province during the control period beginning March
1, 1998 and ending April 30, 1999.
The new limits are as
follows (in pounds of turkey): Ontario, 121,008,298;
Quebec, 61,702,691; Nova Scotia, 7,800,148; New
Brunswick, 5,377,462; Manitoba, 20,400,727; British
Columbia, 32,207,936; Saskatchewan, 10,254,206; Alberta,
24,332,325. The overall total is 283,083,793 pounds.
|
Farm
Products Agencies Act, paragraph 22(1)(f)
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
Farm Debt Mediation Regulations
(SOR/98-168)
The Regulations define the
number and constitution of the Appeal Boards, designation
of members and the appeal procedures under procedures for
providing mediation between insolvent farmers and their
creditors.
The regulations also:
- provide a definition of
the term "related" for the purposes of Section 20 and
Subsection 22(2) of the Farm Debt Mediation Act.
- define methods of
service that are available to creditors for serving
Notice of Intent to Realize on Security under Section
21.
- require the
establishment of five Appeal Boards: in British
Columbia/Yukon/ Alberta/Northwest Territories; in
Saskatchewan/Manitoba; in Ontario; in Quebec; and in
the Atlantic Provinces.
|
Farm Debt Mediation Act
To be published in Canada
Gazette April 1, 1998
|
- limit appeals to
applications made under Section 5(1)(a) of the Act and
only with respect to the eligibility of the farmer (S.
15(2)(a) or the extension or termination of a stay of
proceedings (S. 15(2)(b).
- permit the farmer and
all creditors of the farmer to appeal the Stay of
Proceedings, Extensions of the Stay of Proceedings and
Termination of the Stay of Proceedings. In appealing a
Stay of Proceedings or an Extension of a Stay of
Proceedings, the farmer or creditor will have 15
calendar days to file an appeal with the
administrator, in the prescribed form, containing the
prescribed information, from the date the notice is
sent to them by the administrator.
- give 48 hours for
farmers appealing a decision to terminate a Stay
pursuant to subsection 14(2)(c) or 14(2)(d) to have
the appeal to the administrator from the time he is
notified by the administrator of the intent to
terminate.
- provide, in all other
cases, 7 days for a farmer to appeal to the
administrator, in the prescribed form, from the time
that the administrator notifies the farmer of the
intent to terminate.
- in defining related
person, covers the various relationships from family
to business partners, shareholders, cooperatives.
- provide a reasonable
period of time for the farmer to receive the notice
and at the same time allow the creditor to serve the
notice if for some reason he has difficulty in
reaching the farmer or any adults residing at the
farmer's residence or in the case of a partnership,
corporation or cooperative association, time to reach
a partner, an officer, a director or agent or any
adult residing at the residence of the partner,
officer, director or agent. In both cases, after a
notice has been served, the farmer still has 15
business days from date of service to make an
application to the administrator before any action to
realize on security can be taken by a creditor.
The regulations were
prepublished in the Canada Gazette, Part I on August 23,
1997.
|
|